Football legal
  • Authors
  • About
  • Subscription
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Linkedin
    Twitter
Football-legal
11
Jan
2017
content image
Football Legal
CAS
Cases
International

CAS 2016/A/4545 Rubin Kazan FC v. Dimitri Torbinskyi & FUR


Date of the decision: 2017-01-11
Arbitrator(s): Sofoklis Pilavios

Both under the applicable Russian Law and under the FUR and FIFA RSTP, a party is obliged to return to the other one the amount of compensation it has received in excess of the legal compensation determined under the FUR and FIFA rules.

Facts/Procedure

On 24 July 2013, the Club and the Player concluded an employment contract for the engagement of the Player as a professional football player from 24 July 2013 until 31 May 2015

On 28 April 2014, the Club sent a notice informing the Player that it terminated the Contract with effect as of 31 May 2014, without any reference to reasons for the termination other that it was made according to clause 4.3 of the Contract.

On 16 June 2014, the Player filed a claim before the Dispute Resolution Chamber of the Football Union of Russia (FUR DRC) against the Club, requesting compensation for the termination of the Contract. On 26 June 2014 the FUR DRC rendered its decision ordering Rubin Kazan to pay EUR 1,500,000 as compensation and imposing a ban on the registration of new players until payment of the abovementioned amount.

On 14 July 2014, Rubin Kazan filed an appeal against the decision of the FUR DRC before the...

Why not join us?

Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations, intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).

Register today and stay tuned to the latest legal news.

Get started
Topics
  • CAS
  • Player/Coach Contract
Keywords
  • Football Union of Russia (FUR)
  • Breach of contract
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • National Courts
  • Swiss Law
Find out more
  • The amount of compensation for the premature termination of an employment contract, that is voluntarily paid by the club to the player despite an appeal pending at CAS, shall be reimbursed in the overpaid part
  • CAS 2016/A/4539 Dimitri Torbinskyi v. Football Union of Russia (FUR) & Rubin Kazan FC
Contact us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies policy
© football-legal.com 2025 - All rights reserved