Football legal
  • Authors
  • About
  • Subscription
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Linkedin
    Twitter
Football-legal
11
Jan
2017
content image
Football Legal
CAS
Cases
Russian Federation International

CAS 2016/A/4539 Dimitri Torbinskyi v. Football Union of Russia (FUR) & Rubin Kazan FC


Date of the decision: 2017-01-11
Arbitrator(s): Sofoklis Pilavios

As repeatedly stated in CAS jurisprudence, the CAS appeals arbitration procedure entails a de novo review of the merits of the case and is not confined merely to deciding whether the ruling appealed was correct or not. Accordingly, it is the function of the CAS panel to make an independent determination as to merits.

Both under the applicable Russian Law and under the FUR and FIFA RSTP, a party is obliged to return to the other one the amount of compensation it has received in excess of the legal compensation determined under the FUR and FIFA rules.

If a CAS panel is unable to determine the applicable interest amount according to the applicable national law, in accordance with Article 16 of the Swiss PILA, which applies by analogy in arbitration proceedings in Switzerland, Swiss law shall apply instead of the applicable specific national law.

Facts/Procedure

On 24 July 2013, Rubin Kazan FC (the Club) and Dimitri Torbinskyi (the Player) concluded an employment contract for the engagement of the Player as a professional football player from 24 July 2013 until 31 May 2015

On 28 April 2014, the Club sent a notice informing the Player that it terminated the Contract with effect as of 31 May 2014, without any reference to reasons for the termination other that it was made according to clause 4.3 of the Contract.

On 16 June 2014, the Player filed a claim before the Dispute Resolution Chamber of the Football Union of Russia (FUR DRC) against the Club, requesting compensation for the termination of the Contract. On 26 June 2014 the FUR DRC rendered its decision ordering Rubin Kazan to pay EUR 1,500,000 as compensation and imposing a ban on the registration of new players until payment of the abovementioned amount.

On 14 July 2014, Rubin Kazan filed...

Why not join us?

Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations, intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).

Register today and stay tuned to the latest legal news.

Get started
Topics
  • CAS
  • Player/Coach Contract
Keywords
  • Football Union of Russia (FUR)
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • National Courts
  • National Law
  • Swiss Law
Find out more
  • The amount of compensation for the premature termination of an employment contract, that is voluntarily paid by the club to the player despite an appeal pending at CAS, shall be reimbursed in the overpaid part
  • CAS 2016/A/4545 Rubin Kazan FC v. Dimitri Torbinskyi & FUR
Contact us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies policy
© football-legal.com 2025 - All rights reserved