CAS maintains the decision of FRF’s Licensing Committees on the ASA 2013 Targu Mures case

CAS 2016/A/4663 FC ASA 2013 Targu Mures v. Romanian Football Federation

Date of the decision: 2017-03-03

Arbitrator(s): Andras Gurovitz

One of the most recent Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) cases in which the Romanian Football Federation (FRF) has been involved is the appeal to the CAS of ASA 2013 Targu Mures (the Club) seeking the annulment of the supporting decision no. 5/27 May 2016 rendered by the FRF’s Club Licensing Appeals Committee, deducting 3 points from the ranking of the 2016/2017 season of the Liga 1 Championship for violation of Article 46 of the National Clubs’ Licensing & Financial Fair Play Regulations, overdue payables towards other football clubs.

The question to answer is why did the FRF’s Licensing Committees consider that the club had outstanding debts towards other clubs?

On 16 July 2015, the Club duly signed a transfer agreement with the club Asociatia Speranta Targu Mures regarding the player Norbert Sandor Feketics.

Also, the Club signed a contract with the player, changing the status of the player from amateur to professional.

Before playing for the two abovementioned clubs, the player represented the Hungarian club Honved Budapest.

After finding out about the contract signed between the Player and the Club, Honved Budapest...

Why not join us?

Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations, intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).

Get started

CAS maintains the decision of FRF’s Licensing Committees on the ASA 2013 Targu Mures case

Why not join us?

Topics

Keywords

Authored by